🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful first step," stated the parliamentarian driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, support gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily happening at the state government level amid federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various figures to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, additional states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more cautious tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this international debate continues, the policies of Australia and others show that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.